Reverse engineering just became a delegated task. rea hit roughly 13k stars on oct 8, an mcp server…
reverse engineering just became a delegated task. rea hit roughly 13k stars on oct 8, an mcp server that lets claude code, codex and cursor tear an app apart from behavior down to native binaries, with 41 inspection tools.
'see a feature you like' is now a prompt.
Context
The REA repository describes itself as 'Reverse engineer anything with agents, from app behavior down to native binaries', one MCP server for reverse engineering across binaries, applications and runtime behavior. Its README says REA connects an agent to tools for inspecting native binaries, JavaScript and Electron apps, .NET assemblies and websites, that analysis runs locally, and that results include the evidence and limitations behind each conclusion.
The GitHub page read shows 16,758 stars at the time of reading. A trade site coverage dated October 7 reports the project going viral.
The star count changes quickly. The note says roughly 13k on October 8, and the page read later shows 16,758, so the two are different moments and neither was confirmed against the date in the note. The count of 41 inspection tools was not found in the pages read, so it is unsupported here, not refuted.
The README names Claude Code, Codex and Cursor-style agents as MCP clients only in general terms in the parts read. The note's list of those three tools is not confirmed from the README text I read.
'See a feature you like is now a prompt' is the author's line. The README's own wording stresses evidence and limitations behind each conclusion, which is a narrower claim than copying a feature.
Related work
- morluto/rea: Reverse engineer anything with agents (GitHub) ↗Primary source for what REA is and what it inspects.
- REA goes viral: one MCP server lets Claude Code reverse engineer anything (AICoder, October 7, 2026) ↗Trade coverage of the project's rise.
Watch next
- Read the README's tool list to count the inspection tools. Check which agent clients it documents.
Sources
Provenance
The note above is reproduced unedited from the original post, first published on Threads on 9 October 2026 at 04:33 IST. Sources are the papers and datasets the note draws on.
View the original post ↗Embed this note
More notes
The air is now being asked to keep its own ledger
the air is now being asked to keep its own ledger: ecmwf’s aifs compo becomes the first ai model to forecast atmospheric composition globally every three hours, cleanair simulates 365 days of pm2.5 over china in ten seconds, and a unified framework maps six pollutants at one kilometer across the whole country. the air now files its own composition report.
read the note →The current is now being asked to draw its own map
the current is now being asked to draw its own map: china’s langya 2.0 predicts six ocean phenomena including internal waves and mesoscale eddies, a deep net called wenhai resolves eddies globally with air sea flux formulas built in, and scripps infers surface currents from the way temperature patterns deform in satellite images. the ocean now files its own circulation report.
read the note →The soil is now being asked to report its own carbon
the soil is now being asked to report its own carbon: a nix color sensor paired with generative data augmentation predicts soil organic carbon without a lab, random forest drives 74 percent of soil health mapping studies, and sentinel 2 tracks five year carbon change across france and italy from 922 samples. the dirt now files its own carbon account.
read the note →